Genetic Factors Contributing to Suicide Risk

  • Jun 1st 2025
  • Est. 14 minutes read

The loss of a loved one to suicide often leaves families grappling with profound grief and unanswered questions, such as why it happened and if it could have been prevented. The exact causes of suicide are often complex, involving a variety of biological, psychological, and environmental factors. Among these, a genetic predisposition to suicide can play a key role. Understanding the hereditary components of suicidal behavior is essential for furthering our understanding of it and helping in its prevention.

Becoming Suicidal: Biological Contributions

Suicide is a critical global health issue, claiming over 700,000 lives each year and ranking as the fourth leading cause of death among individuals aged 15 to 29. While suicide is often attributed to trauma, life stressors such as financial hardship or relationship breakdowns, and severe mental health disorders, the underlying causes are far more complex; suicidality results from an intricate interplay of biological, environmental, and psychological factors.

Biological vulnerabilities, such as genetic predispositions, can increase the risk of suicidality, much like hereditary conditions such as alcoholism. Recognizing this genetic component does not diminish the influence of life experiences or social context but highlights the importance of proactive risk assessment. 

Just as individuals with a family history of addiction may adopt preventive strategies, greater awareness of biological risk factors for suicide can empower individuals and clinicians to intervene earlier and more effectively.

The Stress Response and Neurobiology

Genetic predisposition plays a significant role in suicidal behavior, but biological processes within the body are often responsible for activating these genes. One key factor is the body’s stress regulation system, particularly the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. This system controls the release of cortisol, a stress hormone. When the HPA axis becomes dysregulated and remains overactive, it continuously releases cortisol, overwhelming the body and impairing its ability to manage stress. Chronic overactivation of the HPA axis has been linked to increased expression of genes such as FKBP5 and NR3C1, both associated with heightened risk for suicidality [1]

Environmental stressors further influence this biological vulnerability through a process known as epigenetics. Epigenetics refers to how experiences and environmental factors can alter gene expression without changing the underlying DNA. Traumatic or high-stress events can trigger these epigenetic changes, effectively “switching on” genes that contribute to emotional dysregulation and suicidal ideation [2]

In summary, specific genes can shape an individual’s stress response. Still, it is the interaction between these genetic factors and external experiences that often increases the risk for suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Understanding this relationship underscores the importance of early intervention and stress management in individuals with known biological vulnerabilities.

Psychiatric Disorders as a Biological Pathway

Suicide is often understood as a consequence of mental illness, and this association is supported by data showing that approximately 90 percent of individuals who die by suicide have a psychiatric disorder at the time of death. Conditions such as depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia are strongly linked to increased suicide risk [3]

However, emerging research indicates that suicidality may have distinct genetic underpinnings separate from those associated with psychiatric diagnoses. An extensive study revealed a notable genetic overlap between mental health conditions and suicide, but it also uncovered genetic markers unique to suicidality itself [4][5]

For instance, changes in DNA located on chromosome 7 have been independently linked to suicide risk, even after accounting for coexisting mental health conditions [4][6]. This finding suggests that suicidality is not merely a symptom of psychiatric illness but may represent a separate biological vulnerability. Recognizing this distinction can lead to more targeted prevention and treatment strategies.

Interaction Between Biology and Environment

While genetics plays a significant role in suicide risk, they are not the sole cause. Instead, specific genes create a predisposition, making individuals more vulnerable to environmental stressors such as trauma, abuse, or chronic stress. This genetic sensitivity to stress can increase suicide risk through mechanisms like epigenetic changes and neurobiological disruptions.

Individuals with specific genetic markers related to stress regulation often have greater difficulty coping with adverse experiences. These markers can intensify emotional reactivity, leading to a heightened risk of suicidal ideation or behavior. Moreover, these genetic influences affect brain chemistry, disrupting key neurotransmitter systems such as serotonin and glutamate. Dysregulation in these pathways can impair emotional regulation, memory, and the brain’s ability to respond to positive experiences, compounding psychological distress [7][8]

In understanding how biology and the environment interact to influence suicide risk, it is essential to define what suicidal ideation entails. 

What Is Suicidal Ideation?

Suicidal ideation is not a mental disorder in itself but a range of thoughts centered around death and suicide. These thoughts can include a general desire to die, imagining specific methods, or actively formulating a plan to end one’s life. Suicidal ideation is frequently linked to underlying mental health conditions or significant life stressors, but it exists on a continuum and can vary in severity and intensity [9]

There are two main types: passive ideation, where an individual thinks about dying without intention to act, and active ideation, where there is intent or a plan. Mental health professionals pay close attention to whether ideation is passive or active, as the latter signals a much higher risk for suicide attempts.

This issue is widespread. A cross-national study found that 9.2% of people report lifetime suicidal ideation, with 3.1% forming plans and 2.7% attempting suicide [10]. Alarmingly, 60% of those with suicidal thoughts will attempt within the first year of onset, highlighting the urgency of identifying genetic, psychological, and environmental factors early. Understanding the biological roots of suicidal ideation may be key to preventing future tragedies.

Is Suicidal Behavior Genetic?

Research has consistently shown that suicidal behavior can have a significant hereditary component. Genetic predispositions are estimated to account for 30% to 55% of the risk associated with suicidal thoughts, attempts, and death by suicide [10]

While there is overlap between the genetic factors involved in suicide and those linked to psychiatric conditions like depression, some genetic variations appear to be tied explicitly to suicidality itself.

Specific gene variants affect serotonin regulation, a neurotransmitter crucial to emotional stability and stress response. For instance, changes in serotonin-related genes, such as 5HTTLPR and SLC6A4, have been associated with lower serotonin availability in the brain, increasing vulnerability to depression and suicidal behavior [11]. These genes may influence how efficiently serotonin is processed, affecting mood, coping mechanisms, and emotional resilience.

Yet serotonin is only one piece of a far more complex puzzle. Dozens of other genes, interacting with the environment and behavior, collectively shape an individual’s suicide risk.

Other Genes Linked to Suicide Risk

Research has linked specific genetic markers to an increased risk of suicide, particularly neurexin-1, which is involved in neural signaling, and the BDNF Met allele (Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor), which plays a role in brain plasticity and emotional regulation. These markers frequently appear in family and twin studies, suggesting a hereditary component to suicidal behavior [5].

In more recent findings, a large-scale study of U.S. military veterans identified four specific genes associated with heightened suicide risk:

  • ESR1: Linked to PTSD and depression. This gene may help explain differences in how depression and suicide affect men and women. Loss of ESR1 function appears to impact brain health more significantly in men.
  • DRD2: Associated with risky behavior, mood disorders, ADHD, and alcohol use. This gene is also implicated in suicide attempts.
  • DCC: Active throughout life, with higher levels frequently found in individuals who die by suicide.
  • TRAF3: Connected to antisocial behavior and substance use. It’s also influenced by lithium, a medication known to reduce suicide risk.

These discoveries highlight the growing understanding of how specific genes contribute to suicide vulnerability, independent of broader mental health diagnoses.

Additional genes that have been identified include [2]:

GeneWhat It Does
FKBP5This gene plays a significant role in how people respond to stress. Changes in FKBP5 can make people more sensitive to stress, increasing the risk of suicidal thoughts or actions.
CRH/CRHR1These genes help control how the body handles stress. In people with trauma, changes in CRHR1 can raise the risk of suicide.
NR3C1This gene affects how the body calms down after stress. When it doesn’t work correctly, stress builds up and raises the chance of suicidality.
SKA2Abnormalities in this gene have been linked to impaired stress hormone regulation, which may increase the risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviors.
Other GenesGenes like CRHR2, CRHBP, MC2R, and POMC also affect stress responses, but their exact role in suicide risk is less clear. 

Scientists describe suicide as polygenic, meaning it is influenced by multiple genes rather than a single genetic factor. These genes may interact or undergo changes that collectively increase vulnerability. However, because epigenetics plays a critical role, many genes only exert their effects when activated by external triggers. This highlights the importance of examining the environmental factors, such as trauma, chronic stress, or abuse, that can activate these genetic predispositions and contribute to suicidal behavior.

Environmental Causes of Suicidal Ideation

Individuals’ genetic makeup influences how they respond to stress, but it does not operate in isolation. Instead, genetics and life experiences, particularly trauma, abuse, or chronic stress, interact in complex ways. These environmental stressors can activate or amplify underlying genetic vulnerabilities that might otherwise remain inactive.

For example, genes such as FKBP5 and CRHR1, which play key roles in regulating the body’s stress response, can become dysregulated following early trauma. This can result in lasting alterations to cortisol levels and an increased risk of suicidal behaviors [2].

Epigenetic changes, like DNA methylation, can affect how genes work by turning them “on” or “off” without changing the DNA itself. This means that even though a person’s genes stay the same, life experiences can influence how those genes function, especially stressful or traumatic ones. 

For instance, methylation changes in the NR3C1 gene, responsible for cortisol feedback, can impair the body’s ability to recover from stress. These biological shifts underscore how adverse life events can reshape gene function, potentially heightening an individual’s vulnerability to suicide [2].

Some environmental causes that may trigger genetic vulnerabilities include the following: 

  • Financial: Economic stress, including unemployment, financial strain, and job insecurity, is one of the strongest predictors of suicidal ideation. Financial crises and long-term unemployment have been shown to disproportionately affect working-age men, making them much more at risk. 
  • Social Factors: Isolation and family breakdown are other common triggers. Divorce, separation, or a lack of supportive relationships can leave one with feelings of hopelessness and disconnection. On the other hand, strong family ties and a healthy marriage can serve as protective factors.
  • Cultural: Societal views on suicide (whether it is stigmatized or normalized) can influence individual behavior. Media coverage of suicides, particularly involving celebrities, has given rise to “suicide contagion,” where others mimic these acts [11].
  • Trauma: Childhood stress, prolonged high-stress situations, or even single events (think the loss of a loved one or trauma leading to PTSD) are all external events that trigger an internal physiological response. With a specific set of genetic markers, these types of events can lead to more suicidal ideation than in those without them.

How to Prevent and Treat Suicidal Ideation

Given the complexity of suicide risk, where genetic predispositions interact with life experiences, treatment and prevention must be equally comprehensive.

Medications

Because neurobiology plays a central role, treatment often begins with addressing neurotransmitter imbalances. Research consistently shows that individuals experiencing suicidal ideation tend to have lower serotonin levels, a finding linked to genetic factors affecting serotonin regulation. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are commonly used to help restore this balance and reduce symptoms.

In addition to serotonin, two other brain chemicals, glutamate and norepinephrine, are essential when it comes to mood and suicide risk. When glutamate doesn’t work correctly in the brain, it’s often linked to serious mood problems. One treatment that targets glutamate is ketamine, a medication that can quickly improve depression symptoms. It’s sometimes used in medical settings when fast-acting help is needed, especially for people struggling with suicidal thoughts.

However, it must be administered under medical supervision due to its anesthetic properties. Similarly, medications targeting norepinephrine pathways may help manage emotional dysregulation and impulsivity.

Stabilizing the HPA axis is another treatment goal. Chronic dysregulation of this stress-response system leads to elevated cortisol levels, further disrupting mood and cognitive function. By regulating this system, clinicians can support the recovery of neurochemical balance and reduce suicidal ideation.

Other pharmacological options may include mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics, especially for individuals with co-occurring psychiatric conditions. These highly individualized decisions require careful psychiatric evaluation to ensure safety and efficacy.

Therapeutic Approaches

Medication is just one part of a comprehensive approach to healing. Consistent therapy is essential for long-term recovery. Two of the most effective therapeutic options include:

  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): This approach helps reduce suicidal ideation by identifying and challenging distorted thinking patterns that contribute to feelings of hopelessness. It equips individuals with more balanced, constructive ways of thinking.
  • Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT): Specifically developed for individuals with chronic suicidal thoughts and emotional dysregulation, DBT combines cognitive-behavioral strategies with mindfulness techniques. It teaches skills for managing distress, improving emotional control, and fostering healthier relationships.

These therapies support emotional resilience and help individuals build tools to manage complex thoughts and feelings more effectively.

Community Support

Loneliness and social isolation are major contributors to suicidal ideation. When someone is experiencing active suicidal thoughts, the priority should be accessing immediate support through crisis hotlines or emergency mental health services.

Ongoing support is essential. Ideally, this comes from trusted friends or family members who can offer empathy and stability. However, building peer support through community groups or mental health organizations can be equally vital for individuals without a strong personal network. Meaningful human connection fosters a sense of belonging and strengthens resilience against suicidal ideation.

Integrated Approach

Ultimately, addressing suicidal ideation requires an integrative approach that combines biological, psychological, and social interventions. Medications targeting neurotransmitter imbalances address the physiological aspects, while evidence-based therapies such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) or Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) help individuals reframe harmful thought patterns and build emotional regulation skills. Equally important are strong community support systems that reduce isolation and provide connection. By addressing internal and external factors, this comprehensive strategy offers the most effective path to prevention and healing.

Conclusion

Suicidal ideation is a profoundly complex issue shaped by the interaction between genetic vulnerability, neurobiological imbalances, psychological distress, and environmental stressors. While specific genes may increase susceptibility, these risks are often triggered or intensified by trauma, chronic stress, or lack of social support. Understanding this intricate web of influences helps dismantle the myth that suicide is caused by one factor alone.

Effective prevention and treatment require a multifaceted approach. Medications can regulate neurotransmitters like serotonin and glutamate, while therapies such as CBT and DBT equip individuals with tools to manage thoughts and emotions. Just as crucial is the role of human connection; support from friends, family, peer groups, and mental health professionals supports resilience and hope.

By addressing biological, emotional, and social needs together, we can create comprehensive care strategies that not only reduce risk but also promote long-term healing and emotional well-being for those experiencing suicidal ideation.

References
  1. Hernández-Díaz, Y., Genis-Mendoza, A. D., González-Castro, T. B., et al. (2021). Association and genetic expression between genes involved in HPA axis and suicide behavior: A systematic review. Genes, 12(10), 1608.
  2. Balažic, J., & Marušič, A. (2005). The completed suicide as interplay of genes and environment. Forensic Science International, 147, S1-S3.
  3. Nock, M. K., Hwang, I., Sampson, N. A., & Kessler, R. C. (2009). Mental disorders, comorbidity and suicidal behavior: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Molecular Psychiatry, 15(8), 868–876. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2889009/. Accessed June 4 2025.
  4. Mullins, N., Kang, J., Campos, A. I., Coleman, J. R., Edwards, A. C., Galfalvy, H., … & Leboyer, M. (2022). Dissecting the shared genetic architecture of suicide attempt, psychiatric disorders, and known risk factors. Biological Psychiatry, 91(3), 313-327. https://www.mountsinai.org/about/newsroom/2021/largest-genetic-study-of-suicide-attempts-confirms-genetic-underpinnings-that-are-not-driven-by-underlying-psychiatric-disorders. Accessed June 4 2025.
  5. Palmer, C. (2022, October 13). The Genetics of Suicide Risk. University of Utah Health. https://uofuhealth.utah.edu/newsroom/news/2022/10/genetics-of-suicide-risk. Accessed June 4 2025.
  6. Edwards, A. C., Ohlsson, H., Mościcki, E., et al. (2021). On the Genetic and Environmental Relationship Between Suicide Attempt and Death by Suicide. American Journal of Psychiatry, 178(11), appi.ajp.2020.2
  7. DiBlasi, E., Kang, J., & Docherty, A. R. (2021). Genetic contributions to suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Psychological Medicine, 51(13), 1–8. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/genetic-contributions-to-suicidal-thoughts-and-behaviors/E6EB431A2F52485CB1E83EEBF3A28339. Accessed June 4 2025.
  8. Qin, P., Agerbo, E., & Mortensen, P. B. (2002). Suicide risk in relation to family history of completed suicide and psychiatric disorders: A nested case-control study based on longitudinal registers. The Lancet, 360(9340), 1126–1130. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(02)11197-4/abstract. Accessed June 4 2025.
  9. Harmer, B., Lee, S., Duong, T. V. H., & Saadabadi, A. (2024). Suicidal ideation. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565877/. Accessed June 4 2025.
  10. Nock, Matthew K., et al. Cross-National Prevalence and Risk Factors for Suicidal Ideation, Plans and Attempts. British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 192, no. 2, Feb. 2008, pp. 98–105, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2259024/. Accessed June 4 2025.
  11. Sivaramakrishnan, S., Venkatesan, V., Paranthaman, S. K., Sathianathan, R., Raghavan, S., & Pradhan, P. (2023). Impact of Serotonin Pathway Gene Polymorphisms and Serotonin Levels in Suicidal Behaviour. Medical Principles and Practice, 32(4-5), 250–259. https://karger.com/mpp/article/32/4-5/250/863018/Impact-of-Serotonin-Pathway-Gene-Polymorphisms-and. Accessed June 4 2025.
Author Dr. Allan Schwartz, Ph.D. Social Worker, Writer

Dr. Allan Schwartz is a medical writer with over 30 years of clinical experience as a Licensed Clinical Social Worker. He writes about various mental health disorders, eating disorders, and issues related to relationships, stress, trauma, and abuse.

Published: Jun 1st 2025, Last updated: Jun 5th 2025

Morgan Blair
Medical Reviewer Morgan Blair MA, LPCC

Morgan Blair is a licensed therapist, writer and medical reviewer, holding a master’s degree in clinical mental health counseling from Northwestern University.

Content reviewed by a medical professional. Last reviewed: Jun 1st 2025
Medical Content

The Clinical Affairs Team at MentalHealth.com is a dedicated group of medical professionals with diverse and extensive clinical experience. They actively contribute to the development of content, products, and services, and meticulously review all medical material before publication to ensure accuracy and alignment with current research and conversations in mental health. For more information, please visit the Editorial Policy.

About MentalHealth.com

MentalHealth.com is a health technology company guiding people towards self-understanding and connection. The platform provides reliable resources, accessible services, and nurturing communities. Its purpose is to educate, support, and empower people in their pursuit of well-being.