Media Is Emotional

  • Apr 14th 2025
  • Est. 11 minutes read

Media is a constant presence in daily life, influencing how people learn, connect, and perceive the world. While technology expands access to information, constant exposure and engagement can wear down emotional resilience, interfere with cognitive function, and compromise overall well-being.

Media Is Engagement

Media plays a powerful role in shaping emotional experiences and influencing mental health. In today’s digital age, platforms have the ability to influence users on a deep emotional level, creating a lasting impact. While media can offer a sense of community, it can also contribute to negative psychological effects.

Through curated content and calculated interactions, platforms engineer engagement by triggering emotional responses to capture attention. Resurfaced posts, reminders, and artificial memories pull users back into past experiences, sustaining an engagement cycle of attachment and emotional involvement [1].

Platforms also introduce artificial pressures by shaping relationships within curated media environments. Personalized suggestions and targeted visual and auditory tactics influence user preferences and behaviors, tightening connection to daily decision-making. These engineered relationships shape perception, reinforce identity, and guide behavior. Reward systems such as likes, comments, and achievements further encourage ongoing engagement, intentionally keeping users connected to capture and hold attention.

Media Is Stimuli

Just as the parasympathetic nervous system regulates responses to stimuli, ongoing interactions with media continuously shape brain activity and emotional states [2]. The parasympathetic system, which helps restore calm, struggles to function in an era of constant digital engagement.

According to a report by the American Psychological Association (April 2024), news alerts and algorithm-driven feedback loops sustain user engagement while keeping the brain in a heightened state of arousal, contributing to mental and emotional strain. Their findings show that this persistent stimulation, particularly through social media, can lead to emotional dysregulation, prolonged stress responses, and cognitive fatigue.

Unlike natural real-world environments, curated media environments are designed to sustain attention by overriding the brain’s natural regulation. Like physical exertion, the mind needs breaks to avoid overstimulation and cognitive decline.

Engagement Tactics Designed to Stimulate

Visual and auditory tactics, such as notifications, sounds, and colors, effectively keep users engaged by continuously capturing their attention [3]. These elements work together to maintain a heightened state of alertness, making it difficult for users to disengage. Constant alerts disrupt calm, while resurfaced memories trigger emotional responses tied to past experiences. Combined with attention-grabbing design elements, these tactics create a feedback loop that blurs the line between intentional use and compulsive behavior.

Engagement Tactics Designed to Subdue

While platforms use stimulus tactics to capture attention, they also subdue users by dynamically controlling key settings that shape the user experience. Acting as intermediaries, these platforms interfere the ability to make certain decisions, subtly guiding behavior patterns. By controlling sound, haptics, and display settings, media platforms manipulate how users interact with content, impacting autonomy through natural biofeedback and making it harder to disengage.

⭐️ Awareness Tip: Practice digital detox by designating “screen-free” times each day to help restore emotional and mental balance, allowing the brain to recover from constant stimulation.

Media Is Recall

Media has become a managed record of real life, designed for recall. Every click, search, and interaction is stored, analyzed, and used to build a profile of identity, desire, and susceptibility to influence. These records don’t just document behavior, they serve as recall cues that subtly guide future decisions, shaping what is seen, felt, and done, often without conscious awareness.

For instance, playlists can bring back past emotions, and recommendations often match previous moods. While these moments may feel personal or coincidental, they are often carefully programmed to keep users engaged by drawing on their emotional history [4]

Engagement Tactics Designed to Trigger Emotion

  • Artificial Memories: Platforms like Facebook and Instagram deliberately resurface posts within networks to capture attention, such as photos and updates that reignite emotional memories. A photo from a past relationship or vacation can evoke nostalgia or sadness, subtly affecting current mood and emotional state.
  • Curated Health Content: For those with body image concerns, past health challenges, or fitness goals, health-related media reminders can increase anxiety about personal health.
  • Targeted Life Events: Social media intentionally surfaces content related to life events, such as financial matters or achievements. Users may come across ads or posts about budgeting, savings, or spending habits, which can trigger stress or anxiety, particularly for those who have experienced debt or financial instability.

⭐️ Awareness Tip: Media platforms don’t just track behavior, they use it to shape emotions, predict reactions, and reinforce habits that keep users engaged. Recognizing this can help regain control over digital presence instead of being controlled by it.

Media Is Fear

Platforms have commoditized user content, transforming it into a shallow, sensationalized product, packaged and delivered to maintain engagement. News headlines, social posts, and algorithm-driven content are strategically distributed to provoke emotions and trigger reactions, often presenting perceived threats.

When a threat arises, the brain releases norepinephrine, the fight-or-flight chemical, to prepare the body for action [5]. Similar to how thrill-seekers chase adrenaline through extreme sports, many become hooked on the rush of norepinephrine. This surge sharpens focus, heightens awareness, and creates urgency, evoking primal sensations. Platforms exploit this biological response, turning fear into an emotional high that keeps users coming back.

Common Fears in Media Environments

Media environments often intensify emotional responses through repetition, exaggeration, and emotionally charged content. This amplifies fear and anxiety, especially when information is sensationalized or distorted.

For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, sensitive information and alarming headlines spread rapidly, escalating public fear. Even credible sources contributed to the sensationalism by distorting facts about symptoms, death tolls, and potential risks.

This same dynamic appears in political discourse. Fear-driven narratives about immigration and drug smuggling often rely on exaggerated threats. Headlines like “illegal immigrants flooding the border” or “drug cartels infiltrating the country” create a false sense of urgency, further fueling public anxiety.

Similarly, coverage of events like school shootings and terrorist attacks often shifts from factual reporting to sensationalism. Graphic images and viral videos intensify the fear of random acts of violence, making it seem more imminent, even though the actual risk is statistically low.

⭐️ Awareness Tip: Be mindful of how media spreads fear through sensationalism. Stay aware of negative content and prioritize reliable sources to help manage anxiety.

Media Is Social

The connection between social media and emotional health has become a significant concern as research continues to reveal its effects on emotional well-being. A 2023 study conducted by Baylor University, led by Meredith E. David, Ph.D., and James A. Roberts, Ph.D., examined the psychological impact of Instagram and TikTok use. Their findings showed that users immersed in these platforms, experiencing a phenomenon known as “Telepresence”, were more likely to exhibit symptoms of mental illness. Alarmingly, the study found that 28% of Instagram users and 24% of TikTok users met clinical addiction criteria, highlighting the psychological grip these platforms have on their users [5].

Social media has also been linked to rising levels of anxiety and depression, as platforms exploit emotions to drive engagement and maintain influence. This leads to a growing reliance on digital interactions over in-person connections, increasing social isolation and emotional detachment.

Continuous exposure to media adds to this stress, often driven by the pressure to stay current with trends and engage in online debates. The constant comparison to idealized portrayals on social media further erodes self-esteem, intensifying feelings of inadequacy and contributing to depressive symptoms.

Social Media Impacts Health

Social media impacts emotional and physical health in powerful ways, but its influence isn’t always positive, especially when it reinforces unhealthy habits or distorted self-perceptions.

  • The Addictive Loop: Social media’s endless scrolling and instant alerts keep users hooked, making it hard to disconnect. This constant stimulation disrupts sleep, limits activity, and strains real-world relationships.
  • Emotional Withdrawal: Social media offers an escape from real-world stress, but prolonged use can encourage emotional detachment. This withdrawal can lead to lower energy, decreased motivation, and diminished interest in meaningful real-life activities.
  • Unrealistic Standards: Curated and idealized portrayals on social media shape perceptions of success, beauty, and relationships, promoting unrealistic expectations. Constant exposure to these images can trigger comparison and self-doubt, eroding self-esteem and increasing emotional distress.

⭐️ Awareness Tip: Set boundaries around media use by limiting screen time and taking regular breaks from social platforms. Spend time offline through activities like exercise or nature walks without a phone to reduce stress and restore emotional balance.

Media Is Identity

Beyond serving as a stimulus, media plays a key role in shaping identity. Social platforms, in particular, act as mirrors, reflecting curated versions of reality. These images, often filtered and selectively presented, influence how people see themselves and how they think others perceive them. For example, when someone posts a photo on Instagram and receives likes and comments, it boosts their self-worth. However, this validation can create a problematic cycle, where external approval becomes the main factor in shaping self-image [6].

As people seek affirmation, social validation becomes central to shaping their identity. Over time, this reliance on external validation creates a fragile sense of self, making individuals more vulnerable to comparison, criticism, and the pressures of digital norms.

Three Ways to Protect Identity

Protecting identity in digital environments starts with intentional choices that support self-awareness and real-world connection.

  • Set Boundaries: Establish time limits for social media use and create tech-free spaces to promote real-life connections and support self-reflection.
  • Limit Comparisons: Focus on individual paths, rather than measuring worth against the curated, idealized portrayals of others’ lives.
  • Prioritize Authenticity: Share content that reflects authenticity and engage with platforms aligned with true interests and values.

⭐️ Awareness Tip: Focus on self-awareness, not social validation. A true sense of self is shaped offline, not through likes and shares.

Media Is Captive

Wearable media devices, such as fitness trackers and smartwatches, have changed the way media relates with physical and emotional well-being. Companies like Google use these devices to monitor and collect real-time biofeedback, such as heart rate, sleep patterns, and stress levels, alongside media consumption.

Whether it’s the excitement sparked by a YouTube video or the calming effect of soothing music on Apple Music, wearable devices provide media platforms with more than just data. They capture emotional and physiological responses [7]. For example, if a user’s heart rate spikes while viewing certain content, platforms may recommend more of that type, reinforcing the cycle of engagement. This creates a feedback loop where media adapts not only to preferences but also to emotional reactions.

Wearable Media Devices

As wearable media devices become more advanced, they turn the body into a constant source of data, translating emotional and physical responses into insights.

  • Smartwatches: Smartwatches track heart rate, sleep patterns, and stress levels in real time. As users engage with media, the watch detects changes in heart rate or skin temperature and records the emotional response. Media platforms then analyze this data to assess media’s impact on physical state, providing insight into stress or excitement levels during content consumption.
  • Fitness Trackers: Fitness trackers monitor biometrics such as heart rate variability (HRV), sleep quality, and physical activity levels. As users engage with different media, these devices collect biofeedback, tracking heart rate increases or sleep pattern fluctuations after exposure to emotionally stimulating content.
  • Sleep Trackers: Sleep trackers measure sleep quality by monitoring REM cycles, heart rate, and overall restfulness. When media is consumed close to bedtime, these devices detect disruptions in sleep patterns caused by late-night screen exposure or emotionally charged content.

⭐️ Awareness Tip: Consider throwing away wearables altogether and focusing instead on mindful, unfiltered awareness of how media affects the body and emotions. The power comes from recognizing these responses naturally, without relying on wearable media devices to track them.

Media is Awareness

Building a healthier relationship with media begins with awareness. Instead of blaming platforms or specific groups, the focus should be on making intentional, informed choices that promote collective consciousness.

By understanding how media impacts emotions and well-being, individuals can be more mindful of their engagement, while platforms can take responsibility for creating more supportive environments. These shared efforts can lead to a more transparent and healthier relationship with media.

References
  1. Naslund, John A., et al. “Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice.” Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, vol. 5, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1-9. PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7785056/. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.
  2. “Understanding the Stress Response: Chronic Activation of This Survival Mechanism Impairs Health.” Harvard Health Publishing, 3 Apr. 2024, https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/understanding-the-stress-response. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.
  3. Koob, George F. “The Dark Side of Emotion: The Addiction Perspective.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, 2015, Article 85. PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4380644/. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.
  4. Makovac, Elena, et al. “Effect of Parasympathetic Stimulation on Brain Activity During Appraisal of Fearful Expressions.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 7, 2016, Article 1487. PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4915246/. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.
  5. Merino, Mariana, et al. “Body Perceptions and Psychological Well-Being: A Review of the Impact of Social Media and Physical Measurements on Self-Esteem and Mental Health with a Focus on Body Image Satisfaction and Its Relationship with Cultural and Gender Factors.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, 2024, Article 11276240. PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11276240/. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.
  6. Craine, Kelly. “Baylor Researchers Explore Effect of Instagram, TikTok on Psychological Well-Being.” Baylor University News, 3 May 2023, https://news.web.baylor.edu/news/story/2023/baylor-researchers-explore-effect-instagram-tiktok-psychological-well-being. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.
  7. Ferrari, Alessio, et al. “Using Voice and Biofeedback to Predict User Engagement During Product Feedback Interviews.” Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2023, pp. 1-13. ACM Digital Library, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635712. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.
  8. Kramer, Adam D. I., Jamie E. Guillory, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. “Experimental Evidence of Massive-Scale Emotional Contagion Through Social Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 24, 2014, pp. 8788-8796. PNAS, https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1320040111. Accessed 10 Feb. 2025.
Patrick Nagle
Author Patrick Nagle Co-Founder, Director

Patrick Nagle is an accomplished tech entrepreneur and venture investor. Drawing on his professional expertise and personal experience, he is dedicated to advancing MentalHealth.com.

Published: Apr 14th 2025, Last updated: Apr 17th 2025

Dr. Jesse Hanson, PhD
Medical Reviewer Dr. Jesse Hanson, Ph.D. Co-Founder, Clinical Director

Dr. Jesse Hanson is a somatic psychologist with a PhD in Clinical Psychology and 20+ years of neuropsychology experience.

Content reviewed by a medical professional. Last reviewed: Apr 14th 2025
Medical Content

Our Medical Affairs Team is a dedicated group of medical professionals with diverse and extensive clinical experience who actively contribute to the development of our content, products, and services. They meticulously evaluate and review all medical content before publication to ensure it is medically accurate and aligned with current discussions and research developments in mental health. For more information, visit our Editorial Policy.

About MentalHealth.com

MentalHealth.com is a health technology company guiding people towards self-understanding and connection. The platform provides reliable resources, accessible services, and nurturing communities. Its purpose is to educate, support, and empower people in their pursuit of well-being.